Thursday, November 12, 2009

Current Iranian regime should be considered as an occupier...?!

Our country has been occupied by a military force,  If you look at every angle Iran is been ruled under the IRGC the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution that controls Iran’s natural resources, courts, manufacturing companies, telecommunication, rail roads, and media.




IRGC is not only a military force in Iran that supposedly is there to protect Iran from any hostile act but it also has its people by an iron grip. IRGC has spies in all sectors of Iran’s society their job is to report anyone or any activity that is considered against the revolution and current Iranian government.


But the main core of the argument is that has IRGC occupied Iran militarily. I say that IRGC has used military power and military force to scare and squash any movement by the native people of that country.


IRGC has also forced upon the Iranian people cultures and customs that are unknown to people. It has used military force to prohibit people to practice and use their culture, tradition and customs.


Anyone who opposes the military, the leaders of the military is incarcerated, tortured and executed. No one has ever been able to openly criticize this entity, so the question once again is this regime a military occupier or not? I truly believe one can make that argument that they are. 


A military occupier doesn’t have to be necessary be from a different country. If you look at all the facts, the 30 years history of the IRI regime and the crimes and the atrocities that they have committed one can make the argument that they are a military occupier.

No comments:

Post a Comment